| Title |
Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Techniques in Coloproctology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10151-018-1908-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. Gallo, J. Martellucci, G. Pellino, R. Ghiselli, A. Infantino, F. Pucciani, M. Trompetto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 9 | 16% |
| Spain | 7 | 12% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Turkey | 3 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Yemen | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 26% |
| Scientists | 10 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,269,610
of 25,385,864 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#75
of 1,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,578
of 450,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#8
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.