↓ Skip to main content

Reference genes identification for normalization of qPCR under multiple stresses in Hordeum brevisubulatum

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Reference genes identification for normalization of qPCR under multiple stresses in Hordeum brevisubulatum
Published in
Plant Methods, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13007-018-0379-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lili Zhang, Qike Zhang, Ying Jiang, Yang Li, Haiwen Zhang, Ruifen Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,175,585
of 24,093,053 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#759
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,621
of 442,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,093,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.