| Title |
A simple and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 platform for induction of single and multiple, heritable mutations in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-018-0382-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastian Gasparis, Maciej Kała, Mateusz Przyborowski, Leszek A. Łyżnik, Wacław Orczyk, Anna Nadolska-Orczyk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 33% |
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Thailand | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 25% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 33 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,768,052
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#204
of 1,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,692
of 435,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.