↓ Skip to main content

Processes, practices and influence: a mixed methods study of public health contributions to alcohol licensing in local government

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Processes, practices and influence: a mixed methods study of public health contributions to alcohol licensing in local government
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-6306-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna Reynolds, Michael McGrath, Jessica Engen, Ghazaleh Pashmi, Matthew Andrews, Jin Lim, Karen Lock

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 20 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Psychology 4 7%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 21 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,424,048
of 23,485,296 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,760
of 15,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,927
of 437,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#66
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,296 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.