↓ Skip to main content

Silica crystals and aluminum salts activate the NALP3 inflammasome through phagosomal destabilization

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Immunology, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2458 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1037 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Silica crystals and aluminum salts activate the NALP3 inflammasome through phagosomal destabilization
Published in
Nature Immunology, July 2008
DOI 10.1038/ni.1631
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veit Hornung, Franz Bauernfeind, Annett Halle, Eivind O Samstad, Hajime Kono, Kenneth L Rock, Katherine A Fitzgerald, Eicke Latz

Abstract

Inhalation of silica crystals causes inflammation in the alveolar space. Prolonged exposure to silica can lead to the development of silicosis, an irreversible, fibrotic pulmonary disease. The mechanisms by which silica and other crystals activate immune cells are not well understood. Here we demonstrate that silica and aluminum salt crystals activated inflammasomes formed by the cytoplasmic receptor NALP3. NALP3 activation required phagocytosis of crystals, and this uptake subsequently led to lysosomal damage and rupture. 'Sterile' lysosomal damage (without crystals) also induced NALP3 activation, and inhibition of either phagosomal acidification or cathepsin B activity impaired NALP3 activation. Our results indicate that the NALP3 inflammasome senses lysosomal damage as an endogenous 'danger' signal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,037 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 1%
Germany 6 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 11 1%
Unknown 992 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 260 25%
Researcher 154 15%
Student > Master 112 11%
Student > Bachelor 108 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 65 6%
Other 154 15%
Unknown 184 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 289 28%
Immunology and Microbiology 140 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 123 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 123 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 35 3%
Other 124 12%
Unknown 203 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,313,530
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Immunology
#844
of 4,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,022
of 97,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Immunology
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.