| Title |
Interventions to Optimise Prescribing in Older People with Dementia: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drugs & Aging, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40266-018-0620-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leila Shafiee Hanjani, Duncan Long, Nancye M. Peel, Geeske Peeters, Christopher R. Freeman, Ruth E. Hubbard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 24% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 52% |
| Scientists | 6 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Librarian | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 34 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,149,655
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#109
of 1,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,490
of 435,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.