| Title |
What is the diagnostic accuracy of single nerve conduction studies and muscle ultrasound to identify critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2281-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel A. Kelmenson, Dianna Quan, Marc Moss |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| Mexico | 2 | 11% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 95% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,242,445
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,636
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,755
of 429,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#67
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.