| Title |
Intra-aortic balloon pump: is the tide turning?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2266-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandro Gelsomino, Daniel M. Johnson, Roberto Lorusso |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Serbia | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
| Professor | 3 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 65% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,550,492
of 25,599,531 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,202
of 6,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,780
of 445,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#56
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,599,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.