↓ Skip to main content

The clinical use of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) enumeration for staging of metastatic breast cancer (MBC): International expert consensus paper

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 1,947)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The clinical use of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) enumeration for staging of metastatic breast cancer (MBC): International expert consensus paper
Published in
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, December 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.12.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimo Cristofanilli, Jean-Yves Pierga, James Reuben, Alfred Rademaker, Andrew A Davis, Dieter J Peeters, Tanja Fehm, Franco Nolé, Rafael Gisbert-Criado, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Salvatore Grisanti, Mario Giuliano, Jose A Garcia-Saenz, Justin Stebbing, Carlos Caldas, Paola Gazzaniga, Luis Manso, Rita Zamarchi, Angela Fernandez de Lascoiti, Leticia De Mattos-Arruda, Michail Ignatiadis, Luc Cabel, Steven J van Laere, Franziska Meier-Stiegen, Maria-Teresa Sandri, Jose Vidal-Martinez, Eleni Politaki, Francesca Consoli, Daniele Generali, Maria Rosa Cappelletti, Eduardo Diaz-Rubio, Jonathan Krell, Sarah-Jane Dawson, Cristina Raimondi, Annemie Rutten, Wolfgang Janni, Elisabetta Munzone, Vicente Carañana, Sofia Agelaki, Camillo Almici, Luc Dirix, Erich-Franz Solomayer, Laura Zorzino, Lauren Darrigues, Jorge S Reis-Filho, Lorenzo Gerratana, Stefan Michiels, François-Clément Bidard, Klaus Pantel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 160 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Master 15 9%
Other 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 52 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 9%
Engineering 8 5%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 57 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,473,895
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
#47
of 1,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,189
of 443,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.