↓ Skip to main content

Structural genomics is the largest contributor of novel structural leverage

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Structural genomics is the largest contributor of novel structural leverage
Published in
Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10969-008-9055-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajesh Nair, Jinfeng Liu, Ta-Tsen Soong, Thomas B. Acton, John K. Everett, Andrei Kouranov, Andras Fiser, Adam Godzik, Lukasz Jaroszewski, Christine Orengo, Gaetano T. Montelione, Burkhard Rost

Abstract

The Protein Structural Initiative (PSI) at the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) is funding four large-scale centers for structural genomics (SG). These centers systematically target many large families without structural coverage, as well as very large families with inadequate structural coverage. Here, we report a few simple metrics that demonstrate how successfully these efforts optimize structural coverage: while the PSI-2 (2005-now) contributed more than 8% of all structures deposited into the PDB, it contributed over 20% of all novel structures (i.e. structures for protein sequences with no structural representative in the PDB on the date of deposition). The structural coverage of the protein universe represented by today's UniProt (v12.8) has increased linearly from 1992 to 2008; structural genomics has contributed significantly to the maintenance of this growth rate. Success in increasing novel leverage (defined in Liu et al. in Nat Biotechnol 25:849-851, 2007) has resulted from systematic targeting of large families. PSI's per structure contribution to novel leverage was over 4-fold higher than that for non-PSI structural biology efforts during the past 8 years. If the success of the PSI continues, it may just take another approximately15 years to cover most sequences in the current UniProt database.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Germany 2 4%
United Kingdom 2 4%
Canada 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 40 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Master 6 12%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 20%
Chemistry 4 8%
Unspecified 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 1 2%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2009.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
#79
of 107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,417
of 169,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 107 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.