↓ Skip to main content

Morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing fecal diversion as an adjunct to wound healing: a NSQIP comparison study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Plastic Surgery, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing fecal diversion as an adjunct to wound healing: a NSQIP comparison study
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00238-018-1478-0
Authors

Matthew E. Pontell, Robert Kucejko, Dane Scantling, Michael Weingarten, David Stein

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Unknown 5 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,555,964
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#255
of 481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,620
of 435,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 481 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.