| Title |
Association between time preference, present-bias and physical activity: implications for designing behavior change interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6305-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth F. Hunter, Jianjun Tang, George Hutchinson, Susan Chilton, David Holmes, Frank Kee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 67% |
| Ireland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 16% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 14% |
| Psychology | 5 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,192,470
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,318
of 16,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,924
of 448,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#165
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.