| Title |
A newly developed porcine training model for transurethral piecemeal and en bloc resection of bladder tumour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Urology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00345-018-2602-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Chak-Lam Cho, Yong Wei, Shuji Isotani, Ho-Yee Tiong, Teng-Aik Ong, Kittinut Kijvikai, Peggy Sau-Kwan Chu, Eddie Shu-Yin Chan, Chi-Fai Ng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 8% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 43% |
| Engineering | 2 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,086,256
of 25,225,928 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#110
of 2,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,736
of 418,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#4
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,928 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.