| Title |
The Sensitivity ofCeriodaphnia dubia andDaphnia magna to seven chemicals utilizing the three-brood test
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, February 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01055906 |
| Authors |
U. M. Cowgill, D. P. Milazzo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 24% |
| Engineering | 5 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2009.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#311
of 2,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,649
of 60,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.