| Title |
Synthesis of the sednet work package 2 outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Soils and Sediments, December 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02991115 |
| Authors |
Philip N. Owens, Sabine Apitz, Ramon Batalla, Alison Collins, Marc Eisma, Heinz Glindemann, Sjoerd Hoornstra, Harald Köthe, John Quinton, Kevin Taylor, Bernhard Westrich, Sue White, Helen Wilkinson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 20% |
| Professor | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 9 | 36% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2006.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Soils and Sediments
#142
of 507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,521
of 144,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Soils and Sediments
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 507 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them