↓ Skip to main content

Decomposition of differences in health expectancy by cause

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Decomposition of differences in health expectancy by cause
Published in
Demography, May 2004
DOI 10.1353/dem.2004.0017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilma J. Nusselder, Caspar W. N. Looman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Spain 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 58 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 26%
Researcher 15 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 26%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2007.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#1,459
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,623
of 63,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.