You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consumer Exposure to Fragrance Ingredients: Providing Estimates for Safety Evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology: RTP, December 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1006/rtph.2002.1581 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter A. Cadby, William R. Troy, Matthias G.H. Vey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 18% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,339,368
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology: RTP
#549
of 2,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,227
of 135,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology: RTP
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them