↓ Skip to main content

Changes in the pelagic microbial food web due to artificial eutrophication

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Ecology, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Changes in the pelagic microbial food web due to artificial eutrophication
Published in
Aquatic Ecology, August 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10452-006-9041-7
Authors

Agneta Andersson, Kristina Samuelsson, Pia Haecky, Jan Albertsson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 46%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 44%
Environmental Science 20 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2010.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Ecology
#117
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,845
of 93,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Ecology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.