Title |
Changes in the pelagic microbial food web due to artificial eutrophication
|
---|---|
Published in |
Aquatic Ecology, August 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10452-006-9041-7 |
Authors |
Agneta Andersson, Kristina Samuelsson, Pia Haecky, Jan Albertsson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 32 | 46% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 44% |
Environmental Science | 20 | 29% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2010.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Ecology
#117
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,845
of 93,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Ecology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.