↓ Skip to main content

A Review of Occupational Knee Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Review of Occupational Knee Disorders
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10926-010-9242-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher R. Reid, Pamela McCauley Bush, Nancy H. Cummings, Dianne L. McMullin, Samiullah K. Durrani

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 155 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 9 6%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 44 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 25%
Engineering 24 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Sports and Recreations 8 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 53 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2012.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#334
of 694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,114
of 108,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.