Title |
Changes in the prevalence of synthetic cannabinoids and cathinone derivatives in Japan until early 2012
|
---|---|
Published in |
Forensic Toxicology, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11419-012-0165-2 |
Authors |
Ruri Kikura-Hanajiri, Nahoko Uchiyama, Maiko Kawamura, Yukihiro Goda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Poland | 1 | 3% |
Slovenia | 1 | 3% |
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 8 | 24% |
Researcher | 7 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 13 | 39% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,256,565
of 24,739,153 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Toxicology
#53
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,853
of 191,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Toxicology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,739,153 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.