| Title |
Advancement of wound care from grafts to bioengineered smart skin substitutes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Biomaterials, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40204-014-0030-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin Augustine, Nandakumar Kalarikkal, Sabu Thomas |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 20 | 12% |
| Materials Science | 17 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 60 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,141,129
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Biomaterials
#2
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,169
of 258,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Biomaterials
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 44 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them