↓ Skip to main content

Cost-Effectiveness of Betrixaban Compared with Enoxaparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Nonsurgical Patients with Acute Medical Illness in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Cost-Effectiveness of Betrixaban Compared with Enoxaparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Nonsurgical Patients with Acute Medical Illness in the United States
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40273-018-0757-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Holly Guy, Vicki Laskier, Mark Fisher, W. Richey Neuman, Iwona Bucior, Steven Deitelzweig, Alexander T. Cohen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 30%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2018.
All research outputs
#14,434,507
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#1,474
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,041
of 435,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.