| Title |
A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea C. Tricco, Erin Lillie, Wasifa Zarin, Kelly O’Brien, Heather Colquhoun, Monika Kastner, Danielle Levac, Carmen Ng, Jane Pearson Sharpe, Katherine Wilson, Meghan Kenny, Rachel Warren, Charlotte Wilson, Henry T. Stelfox, Sharon E. Straus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 18% |
| United States | 6 | 15% |
| Spain | 4 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 45% |
| Scientists | 18 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,614 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2597 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 419 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 306 | 12% |
| Researcher | 262 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 154 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 133 | 5% |
| Other | 496 | 19% |
| Unknown | 844 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 435 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 374 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 229 | 9% |
| Psychology | 146 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 76 | 3% |
| Other | 423 | 16% |
| Unknown | 931 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#914,481
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#80
of 2,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,671
of 411,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.