↓ Skip to main content

ABCD

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ABCD
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, July 2016
DOI 10.1097/mpg.0000000000001135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denise S.K. Brookes, Julie N. Briody, Peter S.W. Davies, Rebecca J. Hill

Abstract

Young individuals with Crohn's disease (CD) are at risk of poor bone mineral density (BMD) and reduced lean tissue mass (LTM). The importance of LTM for maintaining skeletal health, in both incident and established CD, is evidenced. We used dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assessment to identify areal BMD and LTM in individuals with CD. In 57 patients with CD (15F; 12.99 -14.16 years) anthropometric, disease activity, bone age assessment, and total body DXA measurements were acquired. A 4-step algorithm was used to assess simultaneous bone and body composition data: areal BMD and height Z-scores, and LTM for height and bone mineral content (BMC) for LTM Z-scores were calculated. Low Z-score cut-off values were defined as ≤ 1 standard deviations below the population means. The CD cohort showed: low areal BMD Z-scores (p = 0.00); and low LTM for height (p = 0.00) according to defined cut-off values. BMC appeared to be adapting for the lower amount of LTM. Correcting for bone age eliminated the low areal BMD Z-scores. As expected, LTM for height and BMC for LTM Z-scores remained unchanged. We present a useful clinical algorithm to show, significant LTM for height deficits, regardless of chronological or bone age, in this CD cohort. BMC seemed to adapt to the reduced LTM, indicating clinically 'normal' areal BMD for age when considered for height. However, the ongoing deficits in LTM may create chronic long term consequences for bone health. Improving LTM should be a focus of clinical treatment in individuals with CD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#4,475
of 5,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,532
of 367,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#38
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.