↓ Skip to main content

A simple model can unify a broad range of phenomena in retinotectal map development

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A simple model can unify a broad range of phenomena in retinotectal map development
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00422-011-0417-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugh D. Simpson, Geoffrey J. Goodhill

Abstract

A paradigm model system for studying the development of patterned connections in the nervous system is the topographic map formed by retinal axons in the optic tectum/superior colliculus. Starting in the 1970s, a series of computational models have been proposed to explain map development in both normal conditions, and perturbed conditions where the retina and/or tectum/superior colliculus are altered. This stands in contrast to more recent models that have often been simpler than older ones, and tend to address more limited data sets, but include more recent genetic manipulations. The original exploration of many of the early models was one-dimensional and limited by the computational resources of the time. This leaves open the ability of these early models to explain both map development in two dimensions, and the genetic manipulation data that have only appeared more recently. In this article, we show that a two-dimensional and updated version of the XBAM model (eXtended Branch Arrow Model), first proposed in 1982, reproduces a range of surgical map manipulations not yet demonstrated by more modern models. A systematic exploration of the parameter space of this model in two dimensions also reveals richer behavior than that apparent from the original one-dimensional versions. Furthermore, we show that including a specific type of axon-axon interaction can account for the map collapse recently observed when particular receptor levels are genetically manipulated in a subset of retinal ganglion cells. Together these results demonstrate that balancing multiple influences on map development seems to be necessary to explain many biological phenomena in retinotectal map formation, and suggest important constraints on the underlying biological variables.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Greece 1 3%
China 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 29 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 27%
Neuroscience 6 18%
Engineering 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2011.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#499
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,616
of 106,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.