↓ Skip to main content

Dopamine in Drosophila: setting arousal thresholds in a miniature brain

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dopamine in Drosophila: setting arousal thresholds in a miniature brain
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, January 2011
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.2564
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Van Swinderen, Rozi Andretic

Abstract

In mammals, the neurotransmitter dopamine (DA) modulates a variety of behaviours, although DA function is mostly associated with motor control and reward. In insects such as the fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster, DA also modulates a wide array of behaviours, ranging from sleep and locomotion to courtship and learning. How can a single molecule play so many different roles? Adaptive changes within the DA system, anatomical specificity of action and effects on a variety of behaviours highlight the remarkable versatility of this neurotransmitter. Recent genetic and pharmacological manipulations of DA signalling in Drosophila have launched a surfeit of stories-each arguing for modulation of some aspect of the fly's waking (and sleeping) life. Although these stories often seem distinct and unrelated, there are some unifying themes underlying DA function and arousal states in this insect model. One of the central roles played by DA may involve perceptual suppression, a necessary component of both sleep and selective attention.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 3 1%
Germany 3 1%
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
China 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 236 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 30%
Researcher 53 21%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Master 20 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 5%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 48%
Neuroscience 49 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 3%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 33 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,048,958
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#5,207
of 11,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,788
of 190,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#61
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.