↓ Skip to main content

The enhanced value of combining conventional and “omics” analyses in early assessment of drug-induced hepatobiliary injury

Overview of attention for article published in Toxicology & Applied Pharmacology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The enhanced value of combining conventional and “omics” analyses in early assessment of drug-induced hepatobiliary injury
Published in
Toxicology & Applied Pharmacology, October 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.taap.2010.09.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heidrun Ellinger-Ziegelbauer, Melanie Adler, Alexander Amberg, Arnd Brandenburg, John J. Callanan, Susan Connor, Michael Fountoulakis, Hans Gmuender, Albrecht Gruhler, Philip Hewitt, Mark Hodson, Katja A. Matheis, Diane McCarthy, Marian Raschke, Björn Riefke, Christina S. Schmitt, Max Sieber, Alexandra Sposny, Laura Suter, Brian Sweatman, Angela Mally

Abstract

The InnoMed PredTox consortium was formed to evaluate whether conventional preclinical safety assessment can be significantly enhanced by incorporation of molecular profiling ("omics") technologies. In short-term toxicological studies in rats, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics data were collected and analyzed in relation to routine clinical chemistry and histopathology. Four of the sixteen hepato- and/or nephrotoxicants given to rats for 1, 3, or 14days at two dose levels induced similar histopathological effects. These were characterized by bile duct necrosis and hyperplasia and/or increased bilirubin and cholestasis, in addition to hepatocyte necrosis and regeneration, hepatocyte hypertrophy, and hepatic inflammation. Combined analysis of liver transcriptomics data from these studies revealed common gene expression changes which allowed the development of a potential sequence of events on a mechanistic level in accordance with classical endpoint observations. This included genes implicated in early stress responses, regenerative processes, inflammation with inflammatory cell immigration, fibrotic processes, and cholestasis encompassing deregulation of certain membrane transporters. Furthermore, a preliminary classification analysis using transcriptomics data suggested that prediction of cholestasis may be possible based on gene expression changes seen at earlier time-points. Targeted bile acid analysis, based on LC-MS metabonomics data demonstrating increased levels of conjugated or unconjugated bile acids in response to individual compounds, did not provide earlier detection of toxicity as compared to conventional parameters, but may allow distinction of different types of hepatobiliary toxicity. Overall, liver transcriptomics data delivered mechanistic and molecular details in addition to the classical endpoint observations which were further enhanced by targeted bile acid analysis using LC/MS metabonomics.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
South Africa 1 2%
Bulgaria 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 55 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Other 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 9 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,445,255
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Toxicology & Applied Pharmacology
#2,372
of 6,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,996
of 108,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Toxicology & Applied Pharmacology
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.