↓ Skip to main content

An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1776 X users
facebook
19 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
238 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
580 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research
Published in
British Medical Journal, February 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmj.i563
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trisha Greenhalgh, Ellen Annandale, Richard Ashcroft, James Barlow, Nick Black, Alan Bleakley, Ruth Boaden, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Nicky Britten, Franco Carnevale, Kath Checkland, Julianne Cheek, Alex Clark, Simon Cohn, Jack Coulehan, Benjamin Crabtree, Steven Cummins, Frank Davidoff, Huw Davies, Robert Dingwall, Mary Dixon-Woods, Glyn Elwyn, Eivind Engebretsen, Ewan Ferlie, Naomi Fulop, John Gabbay, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Dariusz Galasinski, Ruth Garside, Lucy Gilson, Peter Griffiths, Penny Hawe, Jan-Kees Helderman, Brian Hodges, David Hunter, Margaret Kearney, Celia Kitzinger, Jenny Kitzinger, Ayelet Kuper, Saville Kushner, Andree Le May, France Legare, Lorelei Lingard, Louise Locock, Jill Maben, Mary Ellen Macdonald, Frances Mair, Russell Mannion, Martin Marshall, Carl May, Nicholas Mays, Lorna McKee, Marissa Miraldo, David Morgan, Janice Morse, Sarah Nettleton, Sandy Oliver, Warrren Pearce, Pierre Pluye, Catherine Pope, Glenn Robert, Celia Roberts, Stefania Rodella, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Margarete Sandelowski, Paul Shekelle, Fiona Stevenson, Sharon Straus, Deborah Swinglehurst, Sally Thorne, Göran Tomson, Gerd Westert, Sue Wilkinson, Brian Williams, Terry Young, Sue Ziebland

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,776 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 580 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 565 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 99 17%
Student > Master 99 17%
Researcher 68 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 7%
Professor 39 7%
Other 125 22%
Unknown 111 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 145 25%
Social Sciences 94 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 72 12%
Psychology 37 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 3%
Other 80 14%
Unknown 134 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1090. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#14,227
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#350
of 64,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188
of 411,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#5
of 933 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 933 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.