| Title |
Variation in neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 68 centers participating in the CENTER-TBI study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neurochirurgica, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00701-018-3761-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas A. van Essen, Hugo F. den Boogert, Maryse C. Cnossen, Godard C. W. de Ruiter, Iain Haitsma, Suzanne Polinder, Ewout W. Steyerberg, David Menon, Andrew I. R. Maas, Hester F. Lingsma, Wilco C. Peul |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 29% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 14% |
| Sweden | 2 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 31 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,609,759
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#89
of 2,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,898
of 449,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#3
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.