| Title |
A review on the impacts of feral cats (Felis silvestriscatus) in the Canary Islands: implications for the conservation of its endangered fauna
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-008-9503-4 |
| Authors |
Félix Manuel Medina, Manuel Nogales |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 18% |
| Brazil | 6 | 13% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 28 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 87% |
| Scientists | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 8 | 3% |
| Spain | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 266 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 70 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 13% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 161 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 65 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 47 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#514,114
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#51
of 2,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,011
of 103,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.