↓ Skip to main content

Protective effect of saikosaponin-d isolated from Bupleurum falcatum L. on CCl4-induced liver injury in the rat

Overview of attention for article published in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, September 1982
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Protective effect of saikosaponin-d isolated from Bupleurum falcatum L. on CCl4-induced liver injury in the rat
Published in
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, September 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf00510139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroko Abe, Machiko Sakaguchi, Shizuo Odashima, Shigeru Arichi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 50%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Chemistry 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#438
of 1,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,023
of 7,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,892 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.