| Title |
Porous covalent organonitridic frameworks for solid-phase extraction of sulfonamide antibiotics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microchimica Acta, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00604-018-3152-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guiju Xu, Beibei Zhang, Xiaoli Wang, Na Li, Yanfang Zhao, Lu Liu, Jin-Ming Lin, Ru-Song Zhao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 7 | 32% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2018.
All research outputs
#18,661,637
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#845
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#323,666
of 435,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#4
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.