Title |
Learning beyond books—strategies for ambient media to improve libraries and collaboration spaces as interfaces for social learning
|
---|---|
Published in |
Multimedia Tools and Applications, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11042-013-1432-x |
Authors |
Mark Bilandzic, Marcus Foth |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 54 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Other | 17 | 30% |
Unknown | 6 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 19 | 33% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 25% |
Arts and Humanities | 6 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Psychology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2013.
All research outputs
#5,868,045
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Multimedia Tools and Applications
#239
of 4,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,026
of 202,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multimedia Tools and Applications
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.