↓ Skip to main content

The case for replicable structured full proportionality analysis in all cases concerning fundamental rights

Overview of attention for article published in Legal Studies, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The case for replicable structured full proportionality analysis in all cases concerning fundamental rights
Published in
Legal Studies, December 2018
DOI 10.1017/lst.2018.18
Authors

Adam Ramshaw

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Unspecified 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 44%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Unspecified 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#17,377,327
of 25,500,206 outputs
Outputs from Legal Studies
#296
of 386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,866
of 444,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Legal Studies
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,500,206 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.