| Title |
The effect of proctoring on the learning curve of transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Techniques in Coloproctology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10151-018-1910-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. H. E. M. Clermonts, Y. T. van Loon, J. Stijns, H. Pottel, D. K. Wasowicz, D. D. E. Zimmerman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Belgium | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Mexico | 2 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 41% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,094,342
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#218
of 1,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,065
of 415,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#22
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.