| Title |
Back to the future: revisiting MAS as a tool for modern plant breeding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00122-018-3266-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua N. Cobb, Partha S. Biswas, J. Damien Platten |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 53% |
| Scientists | 8 | 47% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 265 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 62 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 77 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 142 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 1% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Unknown | 81 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,852,734
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#279
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,237
of 410,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#13
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.