↓ Skip to main content

A matter of time: study of circadian clocks and their role in inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Leukocyte Biology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
30 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A matter of time: study of circadian clocks and their role in inflammation
Published in
Journal of Leukocyte Biology, February 2016
DOI 10.1189/jlb.3ru1015-451r
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart J. Carter, Hannah J. Durrington, Julie E. Gibbs, John Blaikley, Andrew S. Loudon, David W. Ray, Ian Sabroe

Abstract

Circadian rhythms regulate changes in physiology, allowing organisms to respond to predictable environmental demands varying over a 24 h period. A growing body of evidence supports a key role for the circadian clock in the regulation of immune functions and inflammatory responses, which influence the understanding of infections and inflammatory diseases and their treatment. A variety of experimental methods have been used to assess the complex bidirectional crosstalk between the circadian clock and inflammation. In this review, we summarize the organization of the molecular clock, experimental methods used to study circadian rhythms, and both the inflammatory and immune consequences of circadian disturbance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 22%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 17%
Neuroscience 11 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 27 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,274,148
of 24,909,203 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Leukocyte Biology
#81
of 4,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,278
of 410,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Leukocyte Biology
#4
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,909,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.