↓ Skip to main content

Accountability, Nutrition and Local Institutions in India

Overview of attention for article published in Development, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Accountability, Nutrition and Local Institutions in India
Published in
Development, January 2016
DOI 10.1057/dev.2015.15
Authors

Jaya Goyal, Madhushree Sekher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 34%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,356,841
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Development
#359
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,181
of 395,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Development
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.