You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Modified Bacteriophage Tail Fiber Proteins for Labeling, Immobilization, Capture, and Detection of Bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 6 |
| Book title |
Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-9000-9_6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-8999-7, 978-1-4939-9000-9
|
| Authors |
Matthew Dunne, Martin J. Loessner, Dunne, Matthew, Loessner, Martin J. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2019.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#6,206
of 14,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,239
of 451,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#36
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.