↓ Skip to main content

Organs, embryos, and part-human chimeras: further applications of the social account of dignity

Overview of attention for article published in Monash Bioethics Review, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Organs, embryos, and part-human chimeras: further applications of the social account of dignity
Published in
Monash Bioethics Review, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40592-018-0087-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian Koplin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 11%
Unspecified 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2019.
All research outputs
#14,362,528
of 24,998,746 outputs
Outputs from Monash Bioethics Review
#75
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,924
of 447,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monash Bioethics Review
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,998,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.