| Title |
Health benefits of isoflavones in functional foods? Proteomic and metabonomic advances
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Inflammopharmacology, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10787-008-8023-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. C. Y. Wong, P. W. Emery, V. R. Preedy, H. Wiseman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2023.
All research outputs
#414,600
of 23,878,777 outputs
Outputs from Inflammopharmacology
#12
of 601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#773
of 90,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammopharmacology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,878,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them