↓ Skip to main content

Acceptability of a Rinse Screening Test for Diagnosing Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Among Black Americans

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Acceptability of a Rinse Screening Test for Diagnosing Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Among Black Americans
Published in
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40615-014-0048-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne C. Lechner, Lutécia Pereira, Erika Reategui, Claudia Gordon, Margaret Byrne, Monica Webb Hooper, David J. Lee, Marianne Abouyared, Elizabeth Franzmann

Abstract

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a debilitating and deadly disease. We evaluated an easy-to-administer and innovative rinse that assays soluble CD44 and total protein as HNSCC early detection markers. We examined whether the rinse was acceptable and whether the results would promote screening behavior. This is a prospective observational study. Participants (N = 150) from underserved, low-income Black American backgrounds completed assessments of satisfaction, intention to repeat test, and likely screening behavior after receiving results. Descriptive statistics, t tests, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted. The rinse was highly acceptable to participants and perceived to be acceptable among peers. Participants strongly agreed that they would perform the rinse as prescribed, engage in preventative behaviors if results indicated risk of cancer, and initiate treatment if they had a positive cancer finding. Employed participants slightly disliked the taste of the rinse but were more likely to schedule a follow-up appointment and engage in preventative behaviors based on the results. Those with health-care coverage (including public health insurance) reported that the test was harder to perform than those who were uninsured. An easy-to-use rinse technique is acceptable and likely to promote screening behavior among Black Americans at risk for HNSCC. Given that many cancer screening modalities are considered unpleasant to undergo, this rinse holds promise for promoting screening behaviors and, thereby, may result in early detection of this potentially fatal disease. IV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 34%
Psychology 3 10%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,305,223
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#950
of 1,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,384
of 239,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.