↓ Skip to main content

Acute kidney injury in septic shock: clinical outcomes and impact of duration of hypotension prior to initiation of antimicrobial therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
360 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Acute kidney injury in septic shock: clinical outcomes and impact of duration of hypotension prior to initiation of antimicrobial therapy
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00134-008-1367-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean M. Bagshaw, Stephen Lapinsky, Sandra Dial, Yaseen Arabi, Peter Dodek, Gordon Wood, Paul Ellis, Jorge Guzman, John Marshall, Joseph E. Parrillo, Yoanna Skrobik, Anand Kumar, The Cooperative Antimicrobial Therapy of Septic Shock (CATSS) Database Research Group

Abstract

To describe the incidence and outcomes associated with early acute kidney injury (AKI) in septic shock and explore the association between duration from hypotension onset to effective antimicrobial therapy and AKI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 275 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 12%
Student > Master 30 11%
Other 27 10%
Student > Postgraduate 27 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Other 77 28%
Unknown 64 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 67 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,256,594
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,747
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,465
of 184,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.