| Title |
A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-002-8853-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. A. Talamini, S. Chapman, S. Horgan, W. S. Melvin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 39% |
| Engineering | 24 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,859
of 6,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,717
of 53,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,839 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.