| Title |
Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-010-9850-9 |
| Authors |
Francesco de Bello, Sandra Lavorel, Sandra Díaz, Richard Harrington, Johannes H. C. Cornelissen, Richard D. Bardgett, Matty P. Berg, Pablo Cipriotti, Christian K. Feld, Daniel Hering, Pedro Martins da Silva, Simon G. Potts, Leonard Sandin, Jose Paulo Sousa, Jonathan Storkey, David A. Wardle, Paula A. Harrison |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | <1% |
| Brazil | 17 | <1% |
| France | 11 | <1% |
| Germany | 9 | <1% |
| Colombia | 9 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| Portugal | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 6 | <1% |
| Argentina | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 55 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1956 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 482 | 23% |
| Researcher | 401 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 323 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 167 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 126 | 6% |
| Other | 331 | 16% |
| Unknown | 271 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 892 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 648 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 70 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | <1% |
| Engineering | 14 | <1% |
| Other | 75 | 4% |
| Unknown | 386 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,792,785
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#749
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,893
of 106,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.