↓ Skip to main content

Is R2P still controversial? Continuity and change in the debate on ‘humanitarian intervention’

Overview of attention for article published in Cambridge Review of International Affairs, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is R2P still controversial? Continuity and change in the debate on ‘humanitarian intervention’
Published in
Cambridge Review of International Affairs, December 2018
DOI 10.1080/09557571.2018.1516196
Authors

Noele Crossley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Researcher 6 8%
Lecturer 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 31 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 29 38%
Arts and Humanities 7 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 31 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,159,213
of 25,144,989 outputs
Outputs from Cambridge Review of International Affairs
#66
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,301
of 448,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cambridge Review of International Affairs
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,144,989 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.