↓ Skip to main content

Tools for Teaching Logic

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Tools for Teaching Logic'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Teaching Argumentation Theory and Practice: The Case of 12 Angry Men
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 E-learning and Semantic Technologies: Tools and Concepts
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 CT2.0: A Collaborative Database of Examples for Teaching Informal Logic
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Araucaria-PL: Software for Teaching Argumentation Theory
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Teaching Logic in Philosophy
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 ORGANON: Learning Management System for Basic Logic Courses
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Variables in Mathematics Education
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Logic Training through Algorithmic Problem Solving
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Concrete Epistemic Modal Logic: Flatland
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Satoulouse: The Computational Power of Propositional Logic Shown to Beginners
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Panda: A Proof Assistant in Natural Deduction for All. A Gentzen Style Proof Assistant for Undergraduate Students
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Tools for Teaching Logic
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Adding a Dimension to Logic Diagramming
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 The Many Rewards of Putting Absolutely Everything into Introductory Logic
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The SELL Project: A Learning Tool for E-Learning Logic
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Ten Years of Computer-Based Tutors for Teaching Logic 2000-2010: Lessons Learned
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Logic in Action
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 A Teaching Tool for Proving Equivalences between Logical Formulae
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Mhy Bib I Fail Logic? Dyslexia in the Teaching of Logic
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Information-Theoretic Perspective for Teaching Logic
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Teaching Sound Principles about Invalidity
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Systematic Errors as an Input for Teaching Logic
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 The AProS Project: Teaching Logic to Business and Engineering Students
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Using a Learner- and Teacher-Friendly Environment for Turing Machine Programming and Testing
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Using an Argument Ontology to Develop Pedagogical Tool Suites
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Visual Tools for Teaching Propositional Logic
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Logicamente: A Virtual Learning Environment for Logic Based on Learning Objects
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 A Framework for Coping with Logically-Minded Arguments in Philosophy
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 A Logic Teaching Tool Based on Tableaux for Verification and Debugging of Algorithms
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Designing an Introductory Course to Elementary Symbolic Logic within the Blackboard E-learning Environment
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tools for Teaching Logic
Published by
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21350-2
ISBNs
978-3-64-221349-6, 978-3-64-221350-2
Authors

Blackburn, Patrick, Soler Toscano, Fernando, Ditmarsch, Hans, Manzano, María

Editors

Patrick Blackburn, Hans van Ditmarsch, Maria Manzano, Fernando Soler-Toscano

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Librarian 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 13%
Computer Science 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,109,394
of 23,544,006 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,931
of 8,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,206
of 183,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#54
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,006 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.