You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Critical Care Services and 2009 H1N1 Influenza in Australia and New Zealand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa0908481 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven A R Webb, Ville Pettilä, Ian Seppelt, Rinaldo Bellomo, Michael Bailey, David J Cooper, Michelle Cretikos, Andrew R Davies, Simon Finfer, Peter W J Harrigan, Graeme K Hart, Belinda Howe, Jonathan R Iredell, Colin McArthur, Imogen Mitchell, Siouxzy Morrison, Alistair D Nichol, David L Paterson, Sandra Peake, Brent Richards, Dianne Stephens, Andrew Turner, Michael Yung |
| Abstract |
Planning for the treatment of infection with the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus through health care systems in developed countries during winter in the Northern Hemisphere is hampered by a lack of information from similar health care systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 2 | 25% |
| Australia | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 194 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 18% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 10% |
| Professor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 61 | 29% |
| Unknown | 26 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 111 | 53% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,811,589
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#15,548
of 32,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,521
of 106,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#82
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.