↓ Skip to main content

A Trial of Darbepoetin Alfa in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1792 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
576 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Trial of Darbepoetin Alfa in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2009
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa0907845
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc A Pfeffer, Emmanuel A Burdmann, Chao-Yin Chen, Mark E Cooper, Dick de Zeeuw, Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Jan M Feyzi, Peter Ivanovich, Reshma Kewalramani, Andrew S Levey, Eldrin F Lewis, Janet B McGill, John J V McMurray, Patrick Parfrey, Hans-Henrik Parving, Giuseppe Remuzzi, Ajay K Singh, Scott D Solomon, Robert Toto

Abstract

Anemia is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and renal events among patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Although darbepoetin alfa can effectively increase hemoglobin levels, its effect on clinical outcomes in these patients has not been adequately tested.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 576 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
Australia 4 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 551 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 89 15%
Other 66 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 11%
Student > Bachelor 48 8%
Student > Postgraduate 38 7%
Other 151 26%
Unknown 122 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 287 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 3%
Other 64 11%
Unknown 132 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#371,450
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#5,571
of 32,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#822
of 108,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#14
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.