↓ Skip to main content

Multiplex PCR To Diagnose Bloodstream Infections in Patients Admitted from the Emergency Department with Sepsis ▿

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
patent
8 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiplex PCR To Diagnose Bloodstream Infections in Patients Admitted from the Emergency Department with Sepsis ▿
Published in
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2009
DOI 10.1128/jcm.01447-09
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ephraim L. Tsalik, Daphne Jones, Bradly Nicholson, Lynette Waring, Oliver Liesenfeld, Lawrence P. Park, Seth W. Glickman, Lauren B. Caram, Raymond J. Langley, Jennifer C. van Velkinburgh, Charles B. Cairns, Emanuel P. Rivers, Ronny M. Otero, Stephen F. Kingsmore, Tahaniyat Lalani, Vance G. Fowler, Christopher W. Woods

Abstract

Sepsis is caused by a heterogeneous group of infectious etiologies. Early diagnosis and the provision of appropriate antimicrobial therapy correlate with positive clinical outcomes. Current microbiological techniques are limited in their diagnostic capacities and timeliness. Multiplex PCR has the potential to rapidly identify bloodstream infections and fill this diagnostic gap. We identified patients from two large academic hospital emergency departments with suspected sepsis. The results of a multiplex PCR that could detect 25 bacterial and fungal pathogens were compared to those of blood culture. The results were analyzed with respect to the likelihood of infection, sepsis severity, the site of infection, and the effect of prior antibiotic therapy. We enrolled 306 subjects with suspected sepsis. Of these, 43 were later determined not to have infectious etiologies. Of the remaining 263 subjects, 70% had sepsis, 16% had severe sepsis, and 14% had septic shock. The majority had a definite infection (41.5%) or a probable infection (30.7%). Blood culture and PCR performed similarly with samples from patients with clinically defined infections (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, 0.64 and 0.60, respectively). However, blood culture identified more cases of septicemia than PCR among patients with an identified infectious etiology (66 and 46, respectively; P = 0.0004). The two tests performed similarly when the results were stratified by sepsis severity or infection site. Blood culture tended to detect infections more frequently among patients who had previously received antibiotics (P = 0.06). Conversely, PCR identified an additional 24 organisms that blood culture failed to detect. Real-time multiplex PCR has the potential to serve as an adjunct to conventional blood culture, adding diagnostic yield and shortening the time to pathogen identification.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 157 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 20%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Other 18 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 8%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 7%
Engineering 10 6%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 32 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,864,637
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#651
of 14,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,784
of 107,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#1
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.